From ab84076154707026019f24c4217dd22b651c709e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Boris Kraut Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 01:11:43 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Update docs: Add UpstreamNonFree; apps with AFs are not hidden. --- docs/fdroid.texi | 13 +++++++++---- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/fdroid.texi b/docs/fdroid.texi index 06aab0e0..e9d21039 100644 --- a/docs/fdroid.texi +++ b/docs/fdroid.texi @@ -1037,8 +1037,7 @@ Another example, using extra parameters: This is optional - if present, it contains a comma-separated list of any of the following values, describing an anti-feature the application has. -Even though such apps won't be displayed unless a settings box is ticked, -it is a good idea to mention the reasons for the anti-feature(s) in the +It is a good idea to mention the reasons for the anti-feature(s) in the description: @itemize @bullet @@ -1058,15 +1057,21 @@ are impossible to replace or that the replacement cannot be connected to without major changes to the app. @item -@samp{NonFreeAdd} - the application promotes non-Free add-ons, such that the +@samp{NonFreeAdd} - the application promotes non-free add-ons, such that the app is effectively an advert for other non-free software and such software is not clearly labelled as such. @item -@samp{NonFreeDep} - the application depends on a non-Free application (e.g. +@samp{NonFreeDep} - the application depends on a non-free application (e.g. Google Maps) - i.e. it requires it to be installed on the device, but does not include it. +@item +@samp{UpstreamNonFree} - the application is or depends on non-free software. +This does not mean that non-free software is included with the app: Most +likely, it has been patched in some way to remove the non-free code. However, +functionality may be missing. + @end itemize @node Disabled