make_v0() modified the apps data structure to copy an anti feature for a
specific version to all versions resulting in index-v1 and -v2 to
contain wrong anti feature annotations. This patch fixes this and adds a
test that the data structure is no longer modified.
The bug shadowed bugs in the AF implementation of -v1 and -v2 resulting
in not coping the version specific data. This is corrected as well.
This is also tested now.
For -v2 the AF dict is now sorted to make the result reproducible.
Finally The NoSourceSince AF was added as a per version and overall AF
in -v1 and is now only applied as an overall AF and the test is updated
accordingly.
Signing files is a slow operation, especially with jarsigner. This speeds
up the full test run from 10-12 seconds to 2-3 seconds, which makes it
possible to run the tests interactively again. And it stops signing the
file entirely for tests that do not even touch that file.
In the long run, it would probably make sense to have each test case sign
the file as it needs it, but that's a much bigger change.
This is a vestige of implementing builds from a .fdroid.yml file directly
in the app's source repo. It was never fully complete and seems to not be
used in any apps in fdroiddata. This makes `fdroid build --all` runs much
faster since it does not need to do any git handling for apps that do not
have any new builds to run.
4e8e29794948689281a4e431080e37be9b06e775d330c
If a non-APK is added with the appid/packageName that matches some APKs, it
should through an error.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/hans/code/fdroid/server/fdroid", line 22, in <module>
fdroidserver.__main__.main()
File "/home/hans/code/fdroid/server/fdroidserver/__main__.py", line 211, in main
mod.main()
File "/home/hans/code/fdroid/server/fdroidserver/update.py", line 2343, in main
index.make(apps, sortedids, apks, repodirs[0], False)
File "/home/hans/code/fdroid/server/fdroidserver/index.py", line 142, in make
fdroid_signing_key_fingerprints)
File "/home/hans/code/fdroid/server/fdroidserver/index.py", line 166, in make_v1
v1_sort_packages(packages, fdroid_signing_key_fingerprints)
File "/home/hans/code/fdroid/server/fdroidserver/index.py", line 292, in v1_sort_packages
packages.sort(key=v1_sort_keys)
File "/home/hans/code/fdroid/server/fdroidserver/index.py", line 288, in v1_sort_keys
.format(apkfilename=package['apkName']))
fdroidserver.exception.FDroidException: at.roteskreuz.stopcorona_8.jobf does not have a valid signature!
The key fingerprint should be only hex digits, everything else can be
discarded. That makes it easy to use this function various fingerprint
formats, including the common, human-readable forms spaces between pairs or
quartets.
http://example.org/index-v1.jar now returns the HTTP header
"Content-Encoding: gzip" but then the reply is plain HTML. That
triggers a ContentDecodingError instead of an HTTPError, so this
changes the test to success on any RequestsException.
These were both spamming the output with lots of confusing messages, even
when --verbose was not used. Jarsigner especially has confusing messages,
since it has warnings that do not pertain to APK signatures at all, like
the ones about timestamps and missing Certificate Authority.
closes#405
apksigner v0.7 (build-tools 26.0.1), Google made it require that the
AndroidManifest.xml was present in the archive before it verifies the
signature. So this needs to stick with the jarsigner hack for JARs.
