6d0b1bbe6fae0909683f2c6a154515bc4bfcb674 didn't handle the
allow_disabled_algorithm case at all, so we add it back.
This additionally fixes a (previously existing) bug where setting
allow_disabled_algorithms to True didn't move apks back from archive to
repo. Introduce a new test for this.
The disabled_algorithm archiving logic is still all over the place so
ideally that needs a future refactor.
pickle can serialize executable code, while JSON is only ever pure data.
The APK cache is only ever pure data, so no need for the security risks of
pickle. For example, if some malicious thing gets write access on the
`fdroid update` machine, it can write out a custom tmp/apkcache which would
then be executed. That is not possible with JSON.
This does just ignore any existing cache and rebuilds from scratch. That is
so we don't need to maintain pickle anywhere, and to ensure there are no
glitches from a conversion from pickle to JSON.
closes#163
Debian's autopkgtest defaults to considering any output on stderr as a sign
that the tests failed. it is simple to make this achieve that standard, so
it seems worth it for now at least.
Generating a keystore is quite slow since it means a new RSA key is created.
That only needs to happen in the tests that check that it actually happened,
otherwise the test can just reuse the stored test keystore.
closes#432
This works around the gradle 2.x bug where versions newer than 2.9 cannot
run things. This also then specifies the version of Gradle Android Plugin
that is included in Debian/stretch.
This fixes all the bugs I could find that prevented fdroid from
handling files with spaces in them. This is more important now that
fdroid supports random media files, and Repomaker
This filename has some messed up bytes related to bi-directional script
that is included (Left-to-Right and Right-to-Left). GNU/Linux always
interprets filenames as pure byte sequences. Windows and OSX store
filenames as Unicode strings. So on OSX, the invalid filename gets
converted to a valid name. That works fine, but the test fails because it
is compared to a file generated on Ubuntu, where it preserves the byte
sequence.
This includes an APK with a valid Unicode filename that includes
bi-directional script.
apksigner v0.7 (build-tools 26.0.1), Google made it require that the
AndroidManifest.xml was present in the archive before it verifies the
signature. So this needs to stick with the jarsigner hack for JARs.
It turns out it is error prone to `git push` to a non-bare git repo. For
the offline signing machine, the git remote needs to be a regular git repo
in a directory on a thumbdrive so that once the thumbdrive is plugged into
an online machine, that git repo can be transferred to the online machine.
Since the mirror URLs are per repo section (repo/archive), the mirror URLs
must include the repodir at the end. This was missing for servergitmirrors
found by @cde when working on fdroidclient#35
The new policy is to move APKs with invalid signatures to the archive,
and only add those APKs to the archive's index if they have valid MD5
signatures.
closes#323closes#292
The original logic was checking keepversions against the len() of ALL the
APKs in the repo/archive. The correct thing is to check against the
number of APKs available for the given packageName/appid.
closes#166
Really, it is the fdroidclient parser of index.xml that fails, due to the
hardcoded expectation that there will only ever be a single APK for any
given versionCode. We keep index.xml backwards compatible for old
clients, and use index-v1.json to support new things. Having multiple
APKs that have the same packageName and versionCode will break the client
v0.103.* since that version uses index-v1.json, but still has the hard-
coded database parsing stuff.
#153
uses the standard package.name_123.apk. If that exists, it appends the
shasum. If that exists, then its a duplicate, so its deleted. This should
help @SergeWinters with his 12,000 APKs.
There are many APKs out in the wild that claim to be the same app and
version and each other, but they are signed by different keys. fdroid
should be able to index these, and work with them. This supports having
the developer's signature via reproducible builds, random collections of
APKs like repomaker, etc.
This option was not hooked up at all, and does not make sense as a command
line argument. It should just be a config.py item. In that case, the
presence of config.py marks the current dir as a repo, so there is no
longer a need to test for a dir called repo/ as a safety. This makes the
setup easier, since sync_from_localcopy() now creates repo/ for the user.
Since `fdroid server update` is the place where all uploads to servers
happens, it makes sense to also handle the git push for the binary
transparency log here instead of `fdroid btlog`
This is a bit different than index.jar: instead of their being index.xml
and index_unsigned.jar, the presense of index-v1.json means that there is
unsigned data. That file is then stuck into a jar and signed by the
signing process. index-v1.json is never published to the repo. It is
included in the binary transparency log, if that is enabled.
This just makes it easier for people writing build recipes. Rewriting will
output a list of strings as well.
The test index.xml and categories.txt are updated to include the new number
categories, and the changed CurrentVersionCode to 2147483647 (MAX_VALUE)
Python encode/decode libs work directly with dicts, so the internal dict
can just be passed directly to any of these libs (pyyaml, pyjson, msgpack,
simplejson, etc). This still generates the exact same index.xml as before.
This converts the internal format for the repo timestamp to a datetime
instance, which can be easily converted to UNIX time in seconds for XML
and UNIX time in milliseconds for the new index formats. UNIX time in
milliseconds is directly serialized into a java.util.Date instance by
Jackson.
If a group of items are enclosed in {}, then that will be a Python set,
which does not preserve order. To preserve order, the data must be either
a tuple () or list [].
Since https://gitlab.com/fdroid/ci-test-app is a separate git repo, things
with incompatible changes could get out of sync. Therefore, this test
should specify which git commit is runs against.
For example, the .fdroid.yml file is still a moving target. Just now, the
keys had the spaces removed as part of this MR.
The original index.xml format needs to stay around for backwards
compatibility, but we shouldn't touch it anymore once the new format is in
place. This is a test to make sure `fdroid update` can still generate the
correct XML.
install_list and uninstall_list should be tuples or lists in order to
ensure that the order is preserved.
These tests also check that the added and lastupdated dates are
working correct, based on the dates in tests/stats/known_apks.txt. I
could see no useful way to test the timestamp, it is just hardcoded
using a regexp search-and-replace. Running these tests manually might
require deleting tmp/apkcache.
JSON and YAML are very closely related, so supporting both of them is
basically almost no extra work. Both are also closely related to how
Python works with dicts and pickles. XML is a very different beast, and its
not popular for this kind of thing anyway, so just purge it.
This allows a source repo to include a complete metadata file so that it
can be built directly in place using `fdroid build`. If that app is then
included in fdroiddata, it will first load the source repo type and URL
from fdroiddata, then read .fdroid.yml if it exists, then include the rest
of the metadata as specified in fdroiddata, so that fdroiddata has
precedence over the metadata in the source code.
This lets `fdroid build` apps without having a whole fdroiddata setup, but
instead just directly in place in the source code. This also lets devs
optionallu maintain the fdroid metadata as part of their app, rather than
in fdroiddata without loosing any control. This should make it easier to
spread around the maintenance load.
This makes sure there is a GPG signature on any file that is included in
the repo, including APKs, OBB, source tarballs, media files, OTA update
ZIPs, etc. Having a GPG signature is more important on non-APK files since
they mostly do not have any signature mechanism of their own.
This also adds basic tests of adding non-APK/OBB files to a repo with
`fdroid update`.
closes#232
It is now possible for the server operator to specify lists of apps that
must be installed or deleted on the client (aka "push installs). If
the user has opted in, or the device is already setup to respond to
these requests, then fdroidclient will automatically install/delete
the packageNames listed. This is protected by the same signing key
as the app index metadata.
It generates single XML elements with the data set in the attributes. This
keeps the XML compact and easily extensible, e.g. for adding versionCode,
signingKey, etc as attributes:
<install packageName="com.fsck.k9"/>
<install packageName="at.bitfire.davdroid"/>
<delete packageName="com.facebook.orca"/>
Copyright: 2016 Blue Jay Wireless
Signed-off-by: Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans@eds.org>
closes#177
`fdroid update` should be able to handle any valid filename (hopefully
aapt doesn't barf on them). To handle that, the environment where the
shell commands are run in needs to have a UTF-8 locale set. If LANG is
not set, things default to ASCII and UTF-8 filenames fail.
This also renames test APK with lots of Unicode chars as a test case.
closes#167
Though the YAML people recommend .yaml for the file extension, in Android
land it seems clear that .yml has won out:
* .travis.yml
* .gitlab-ci.yml
* .circle.yml
* Ansible main.yml
serverwebroot has long supported uploading to multiple servers, this bit of
metadata communicates those official mirrors to the client so that it can
automatically do something useful with that information.
closes#14https://gitlab.com/fdroid/fdroidserver/issues/14
This will report the version embedded in the module if it is installed, and
will report `git describe` if being run from git. If someone installs from
git using pip, this will probably report the version in setup.py, which
will be wrong. But that is not a documented install method, and I haven't
heard of anyone using it. The recommended way is to run straight from git.
In order to prevent confusion caused by multiple metadata files for a given
app, fdroid will exit with an error if it finds any app metadata file with
the same package ID as one that has already been parsed.
This provides the final option in this series, allowing the user to just
add --create-key to `fdroid update, and thereby upgrade an unsigned repo to
a proper signed repo. It also might be useful
closes#13https://gitlab.com/fdroid/fdroidserver/issues/13
This is a more flexible approach than testing for the complete SDK and
build-tools up front. This will only test for the commands that are
actually being run, so that if you only have `aapt` installed, you can do
`fdroid update` without errors, but other commands will still give
appropriate errors.
This also makes the build_tools item in config.py optional, it is only
needed if you want to force a specific version of the build-tools.
Just getting into the habit of adding tests to everything that I change...
Also, it should be useful to have an unsigned APK in the test collection,
since `fdroid update` should handle it gracefully and give a warning of
some kind.
The test for the help flag threw an error if there were 0 args, or if arg 1
was set to a space-separated list. The -z tests would fail if the arg was
set to a space-separated list.
