set up install/delete lists for "push" commands from server
It is now possible for the server operator to specify lists of apps that must be installed or deleted on the client (aka "push installs). If
the user has opted in, or the device is already setup to respond to these requests, then fdroidclient will automatically install/delete
the packageNames listed. This is protected by the same signing key as the app index metadata.
It generates single XML elements with the data set in the attributes. This keeps the XML compact and easily extensible, e.g. for adding versionCode, signingKey, etc as attributes:
```xml
<install packageName="com.fsck.k9"/>
<install packageName="at.bitfire.davdroid"/>
<delete packageName="com.facebook.orca"/>
```
See merge request !156
It is now possible for the server operator to specify lists of apps that
must be installed or deleted on the client (aka "push installs). If
the user has opted in, or the device is already setup to respond to
these requests, then fdroidclient will automatically install/delete
the packageNames listed. This is protected by the same signing key
as the app index metadata.
It generates single XML elements with the data set in the attributes. This
keeps the XML compact and easily extensible, e.g. for adding versionCode,
signingKey, etc as attributes:
<install packageName="com.fsck.k9"/>
<install packageName="at.bitfire.davdroid"/>
<delete packageName="com.facebook.orca"/>
Copyright: 2016 Blue Jay Wireless
Signed-off-by: Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans@eds.org>
closes#177
Add ndk r11c
NDK11 is required by some apps (some versions of VLC) which will not build with r10e or r12b. As always, please test this before merging: I havent added a NDK before.
See merge request !155
Parse maxSdkVersion and -23 permission tags
Parse maxSdkVersion and uses-permission-sdk-23 tags and insert them into the index.
AndroidManifest:
```xml
<uses-permission android:name="android.permission.READ_CALENDAR" />
<uses-permission
android:name="android.permission.WRITE_EXTERNAL_STORAGE"
android:maxSdkVersion="18" />
<uses-permission-sdk-23 android:name="android.permission.ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION" />
```
new index format:
```xml
<package>
<version>1.0</version>
<versioncode>1</versioncode>
<apkname>maxmin.apk</apkname>
<hash type="sha256">526eb6d643050c3fae42fb6c001c704006046db52e98998b21f7646ecae3dae5
</hash>
<sig>893fc1f22301c902d05c938b29d21648</sig>
<size>8681</size>
<sdkver>14</sdkver>
<targetSdkVersion>24</targetSdkVersion>
<added>2016-08-01</added>
<permissions>READ_EXTERNAL_STORAGE,READ_CALENDAR,WRITE_EXTERNAL_STORAGE</permissions>
<uses-permission name="android.permission.WRITE_EXTERNAL_STORAGE"
maxSdkVersion="18" />
<uses-permission name="android.permission.READ_CALENDAR" />
<uses-permission name="android.permission.READ_EXTERNAL_STORAGE" />
<uses-permission-sdk-23 name="android.permission.ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION" />
</package>
```
old format:
```xml
<permissions>READ_CALENDAR,ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION,WRITE_EXTERNAL_STORAGE</permissions>
```
This generates both formats for backward compatibility with old clients.
Also increase version of index format.
This is a proposal for the issues discussed in https://gitlab.com/fdroid/fdroidclient/issues/704
@eighthave @mvdan
See merge request !150
Parse maxSdkVersion and uses-permission-sdk-23
tags and insert them into the index, e.g.,
<package>
<permissions>READ_EXTERNAL_STORAGE,READ_CALENDAR,WRITE_EXTERNAL_STORAGE</permissions>
<uses-permission name="android.permission.WRITE_EXTERNAL_STORAGE"
maxSdkVersion="18" />
<uses-permission name="android.permission.READ_CALENDAR" />
<uses-permission name="android.permission.READ_EXTERNAL_STORAGE" />
<uses-permission-sdk-23 name="android.permission.ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION" />
</package>
Also increase version of index format
Empty JDK directories can remain from previous JDK installations. For
example in RHEL/Fedora when RPM upgrades a package it can leave modified
files (usually configs) and, consequently, their directories. So we could
end up selecting a bad JDK path.
This reverts commit 82d09560c6.
It doesn't work - the setup scripts are expecting a ".bin" file (which
is apparently a 7z archive), but what's actually got is a ".zip".
Conflicts:
buildserver/provision-android-ndk
Without this, running makebuildserver from a clean master results in the
following:
$ ./makebuildserver
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./makebuildserver", line 74, in <module>
del(config['__builtins__']) # added by compile/exec
KeyError: '__builtins__'
This is because a clean checkout has no config, thus exec is never
actually ran.
Amusingly, the commit changed more than just this so a simple git revert
is not possible.
The problem is that the zip is replaced with each point release (24.0.1
at the time of writing) and there is no way to get a URL to a single,
non-changing version. Hence any caching or checksums are completely
worthless and will break every few weeks.
Currently, if buildjni is not used but ndk is set to an invalid value,
the build would start but $ANDROID_NDK would be empty. This is happening
in VLC, which results in very confusing errors.
If a build uses a ndk= value that is not set up, such as r11/r12 which
we do not have yet, it should error with "NDK version could not be
found". It does with this change.
Pass a date from APK to KnownApks.recordapk()
... if --use-date-from-apks option is used.
Essentially, it just expands influence of `--use-date-from-apks` option to `stats/known_apks.txt`.
See merge request !141
Properly print warnings to stderr. Also, use : instead of 'echo' as a
fallback as the latter spits out garbage to stdout.
Examples without pep8 installed.
Before:
$ ./hooks/pre-commit
./hooks/pre-commit: line 97: WARNING:: command not found
ERROR: pep8 tests failed!
After:
$ ./hooks/pre-commit
WARNING: pep8 is not installed, using dummy placeholder!
support APK Extension OBB files
Google Play specifies OBB aka "APK Extension" files for apps that need more than 100 MBs, which is the Play APK size limit. They also provide a mechanism to deliver large data blobs that do not need to be part of the APK. For example, a game's assets do not need to change often, so they can be shipped as an OBB, then APK updates do not need to include all those assets for each update.
https://developer.android.com/google/play/expansion-files.html
See merge request !143
OBB files provide a mechanism to deliver large data blobs that do not need
to be part of the APK. For example, a game's assets do not need to change
often, so they can be shipped as an OBB, then APK updates do not need to
include all those assets for each update.
https://developer.android.com/google/play/expansion-files.html
