In the past, some files were tested with the standard profile, others with a
profile in which most of the messages were switched off ... some files were not
checked at all.
- ``PYLINT_SEARXNG_DISABLE_OPTION`` has been abolished
- the distinction ``# lint: pylint`` is no longer necessary
- the pylint tasks have been reduced from three to two
1. ./searx/engines -> lint engines with additional builtins
2. ./searx ./searxng_extra ./tests -> lint all other python files
Signed-off-by: Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@darmarit.de>
When using ``use_default_settings: true``, removing default categories from
settings.yml will not remove them from the UI.
The value ``categories_as_tabs`` is a dictionary type (a4c2cfb) and dictionary
types are merged additive by ``settings_loader.update_settings()``.
This patch replaces the default ``categories_as_tabs`` by the one from the
``user_settings``.
Related: https://github.com/searxng/searxng/issues/1019#issuecomment-1193145654
Signed-off-by: Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@darmarit.de>
Add a new environment variable SEARX_DISABLE_ETC_SETTINGS
to disable loading of /etc/searx/settings.yml
unit tests:
* set SEARX_DISABLE_ETC_SETTINGS to 1
* remove SEARX_SETTINGS_PATH if it exists
I can't set `default_doi_resolver` in `settings.yml` if I'm using
`use_default_settings`. Searx seems to try to interpret all settings at root
level in `settings.yml` as dict, which is correct except for
`default_doi_resolver` which is at root level and a string::
File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/searx/settings_loader.py", line 125, in load_settings
update_settings(default_settings, user_settings)
File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/searx/settings_loader.py", line 61, in update_settings
update_dict(default_settings[k], v)
File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/searx/settings_loader.py", line 48, in update_dict
for k, v in user_dict.items():
AttributeError: 'str' object has no attribute 'items'
Signed-off-by: Markus Heiser <markus@darmarit.de>
Suggested-by: @0xhtml https://github.com/searx/searx/issues/2722#issuecomment-813391659
