Revert "SparkleShare: Add patch to allow install on camera-less devices."

This reverts commit 998d42fd4e. There
doesn't seem to be any point in patching this:
a) It's already been in the repo a long time
b) If we issue another version of a package, with the exact same
version name and code, how is anybody supposed to know which is which?
(I realise in this case it wouldn't make much difference, but the
general principle is important)
c) There is a technical problem in that if a different version of what
should be the same apk is pushed to the repo, installations will be
rejected by the client (until an update is done) because they will see
that the file they download is not what it was supposed to be.
d) The developer says he is fixing it in the next release anyway.

metadata/org.sparkleshare.android.txt

@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ browse your files right from your Android device.
 Repo Type:git
 Repo:https://github.com/NewProggie/SparkleShare-Android.git
 
-Build Version:1.0,1,a9e23f0f9ae6161a786bf48cb48ab3dec20110c9,patch=uses-feature.patch,target=android-7
+Build Version:1.0,1,a9e23f0f9ae6161a786bf48cb48ab3dec20110c9,target=android-7
 
 Update Check Mode:Market
 Current Version:1.0

metadata/org.sparkleshare.android/uses-feature.patch

@@ -1,16 +0,0 @@
-Camera use is optional, don't disallow install on camera-less devices.
-See right side pane at
-http://developer.android.com/guide/topics/manifest/uses-permission-element.html
-
-diff --git a/AndroidManifest.xml b/AndroidManifest.xml
-index d020d9d..1b45bf1 100644
---- a/AndroidManifest.xml
-+++ b/AndroidManifest.xml
-@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
- 	<uses-permission android:name="android.permission.INTERNET" />
- 	<uses-permission android:name="android.permission.WRITE_EXTERNAL_STORAGE" />
- 	<uses-permission android:name="android.permission.CAMERA"/>
-+	<uses-feature android:name="android.hardware.camera" android:required="false" />
- 	<application
- 		android:icon="@drawable/icon"
- 		android:label="@string/app_name"